Skip to main content

Political Post

This past week, Judge Reinhardt died at the age of 87. He was a longtime liberal on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The Ninth Circuit has been difficult for conservatives to deal with due to its influence of liberals such as Judge Reinhardt. However, with this vacancy on the court, along with eight others, President Trump has an opportunity to change the court to his advantage by choosing who will take the openings. He has put forth two nominees, Mark Bennett and Ryan Bounds. Bennett has support from the two democratic senators, however Bounds does not. Despite efforts made by Senator Dianne Feinstein, the senior democrat on the Judiciary Committee, President Trump will choose a nominee much different than Judge Reinhardt.

After reading this article, I find it interesting to see the split between the Democrats and Republicans when it comes to the courts and replacements. Even though the Democrats will oppose the nominees President Trump picks, I believe the chosen nominee will bear almost no resemblance to Judge Reinhardt no matter how hard the Democrats try. However, this one step in changing The Ninth Circuit will not change the history of The Ninth Circuit and its reputation for being more liberal. I chose this article while scrolling through the New York Times' politics section, a known, reliable source. I chose this particular article because it seemed to be a relatively simple topic that I could understand. I do not keep up with politics nor do I have much understanding of them. After reading this article, it interested me and introduced me to the courts, especially the Ninth Circuit.

The New York Times


Comments

  1. I like how you chose this article because it seemed simple, but you ended up learning something. It also introduced you to the courts and expanded your knowledge of politics. Cool.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I like how well and in-depth you explained the court system. I learned a lot from just reading this post. Great post!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Response to "Harrison Bergeron"

After reading Harrison Bergeron I was left very perplexed and with many questions. This story is set in the future with a strict government. The government has decided everyone has to become equal to the most average person. This means anyone who is above average or with great talent, will be tortured into becoming lesser. The story focuses on a couple, George and Hazel Bergeron whose son has been taken away. This seems tragic but with Hazel's average intelligence and George's handicap radio in his ear, neither remember. Harrison Bergeron  follows a very common dystopian plot. This story reminds me very much of Divergent or The Giver in the sense that the government is trying to change or get rid of people in their community that are different. I have many questions regarding this story. Some level one questions are where is it set and what is the purpose of handicapping the people? A level two question would be what is the purpose or significance of the ballerinas? Lastly, ...

Human Nature

I believe that as humans we are fundamentally good. As we grow, we are exposed to good and also bad. No matter where you grow up, how you grow up, with whom you grow up, you grow and change constantly. With all of this change and growth, people are naturally exposed to bad. It is your own decision how you react and deal with bad influences. Parenting can play a large role growing up as parents persuade their children in which direction they want. But at the end of the day, it solely comes down to your own decisions not your parents. My own experiences, religion, and even parenting have led to my beliefs. In the Bible, Adam and Eve are left in the garden. God instructs them not to eat from the tree of knowledge. Eventually Adam and Eve are tempted and persuaded to eat from the tree and decide to do it. God learns of this and Adam and Eve blame each other. In this story, God is like the parent trying to direct his children in which way to act. But again, even with influence, it was Ada...

September 11th, 2001

Before watching the documentary, 9/11: Stories in Fragments , I thought I knew a lot of information about 9/11. But I was wrong. Little did I know how long the event took, that there were more than two planes, and that not only the twin towers were hit. Watching the documentary and having a personal experience toward the event- my great-grandfather having jumped from tower one while his floor was up in flames- made the experience much more intense and emotional. September 11, 2001 is a date most Americans could never forget. As much as we say "Never forget" and other phrases related to this event, historians ponder the question, what if we forget? Artifacts from the twin towers and the pentagon, ordinary, everyday objects have been collected and stored in the Smithsonian Museum. The generous owners of these objects donated them so that we, as Americans, will officially never forget.